HomeNearshore for USAHire DevelopersAI/ML EngineersDedicated TeamWeb DesignWordPressCRM SoftwareProduct DesignAutomation & AICase studiesInsightsContact
Hauer Power/Nearshore/Legacy Modernization Services
Legacy Modernization Service

Legacy Modernization Rewrite & Replatform Without the Big Bang

For US, UK and EU enterprises stuck on .NET Framework, PHP 5/7, Java 8, Rails 4 or AngularJS monoliths. We do strangler-pattern modernization, not big-bang rewrites. Carve off one bounded context, run shadow traffic, prove parity, cut over with rollback in one config change. No 18-month projects that ship nothing until month 18.

15+
Years in business
200+
Projects delivered
94%
Client retention
EU
GDPR jurisdiction
Clutch
Verified reviews →

Trusted by teams across Europe

Chemobudowa Bruk-Bet Bakotech Grupa Matejek Mostostal Kraków Irix Lens Codibly Plastrol Badura URBA Polan CH Beck Avrii CSP Automotive Aspironix Sternet FoxEvents BBPV Tekkni Bruk-Bet Godox Genesis Gear Legprzem ISK School Galicja Museum Jobman Group NewMedical Prokocim Nowy Humanity in Action
01 [In short]

Strangler pattern, not big-bang rewrite

Big-bang rewrites have a documented 70%+ failure rate. We do not do them. Strangler pattern means we carve off one bounded context at a time (auth, billing, reporting, customer-facing UI), build it on a modern stack, run it in shadow alongside the legacy system for 1 to 2 weeks, prove behavior parity, then route real traffic. If anything breaks, rollback is one config flag. You see business value every 8 to 12 weeks, not at month 36.

Legacy system modernization
02 [Modernization approaches]

When each modernization strategy wins

ApproachRiskTimelineBusiness value cadenceBest for
Strangler pattern (us)Low12 to 36 monthsEvery 8 to 12 weeksMost legacy systems above 50k LOC
Big-bang rewriteVery high12 to 24 monthsEnd of projectTiny systems (under 10k LOC) or planned shutdown
Replatform (lift and shift)Low2 to 6 monthsEnd of projectCloud migration without code changes
Refactor in placeMediumOngoingEach PRCode in good shape, just dated patterns
Encapsulate (API in front)Low3 to 9 monthsPer consumerOld system stays, new consumers via API gateway

Honest take: we lead with strangler pattern because that is what works for the size of system most of our enterprise clients have (100k to 2M LOC). For smaller systems (under 10k LOC) or short-life systems, refactor in place or simple replatform may be enough. We assess and recommend, we do not push the most expensive option.

03 [Who picks legacy modernization]

5 typical modernization clients we work with

Pattern: 100k to 2M LOC monoliths on .NET Framework, PHP 5/7, Java 8, Rails 4 or AngularJS 1.x. Hiring is hard, scaling hits ceilings, security patches lag. Strangler pattern milestoned every 8 to 12 weeks.

Discuss your stack →
US enterprise mid-market

15-year-old .NET Framework monolith

Internal CRM and order management on .NET 4.7, SQL Server, jQuery UI. 800k LOC. Cannot hire engineers. Strangler-style migration to .NET 8 and React, 24 months, 1 carved context per quarter.

UK retail enterprise

PHP 5.6 ecommerce platform

Custom PHP ecommerce (no Magento), 1.2M LOC. Cannot upgrade PHP without breaking 200+ client integrations. Encapsulate behind API gateway, then strangler new admin and customer apps.

German manufacturing

Java 8 ERP integration layer

2M LOC Java 8 application connecting SAP to 30 plants. Move to Java 21 + Quarkus on Kubernetes, modernize one integration at a time. 36-month engagement.

US healthcare admin

Rails 4 monolith with HIPAA constraints

Practice management app on Rails 4. Cannot do big-bang due to HIPAA evidence requirements. Strangler to Rails 7 + Hotwire for new features, plus extracted React admin.

EU financial services

AngularJS 1.x customer-facing app

1.x AngularJS app, 200k LOC, 50+ engineers needed for next phase but no one wants to learn AngularJS. Strangler to React with module federation, route-by-route cutover.

04 [How we modernize]

8 things we do every strangler-pattern engagement

01

Audit and bounded context map

2 to 4 week audit of code, schema, traffic and team. Identify bounded contexts (auth, billing, reporting, etc.) and prioritize by business risk and modernization value.

02

Anti-corruption layer

Adapter layer between old and new code. Translates legacy data shapes to clean domain models. So new code is not poisoned by old assumptions.

03

Shadow traffic and parity tests

New service runs alongside old, gets copy of every request. Compare outputs, response codes, side effects, latency. Fix any divergence before cutover.

04

Feature flag cutover

Cutover is one config flag flip per route or per percentage of traffic. Rollback is reverse flag flip in seconds. No code redeploy, no maintenance window.

05

Two-way data sync

During migration window both old and new systems write. Change-data-capture (Debezium) keeps both in sync. Final cutover is read-then-stop on old, validate, allow writes on new.

06

Strangler routing layer

API gateway or reverse proxy (Kong, Envoy, NGINX) routes per-route to old or new. Rollout is one route at a time, not all-or-nothing.

07

Decommission with confidence

Old code stays running until 0% traffic, plus 30-day silent monitoring. Then deprecation cycle. Then deletion. We do not leave zombie code.

08

Knowledge transfer to your team

Architecture docs, decision records, runbooks. Pairing sessions with your engineers. By engagement end your team can extend the new system without us.

Stuck on a legacy stack in 2026?

Strangler pattern, no big-bang risk. Audit deliverable is yours regardless of whether you continue.

Book a call
05 [Cost and engagement]

3 typical legacy modernization scenarios

Dedicated team, monthly billing. Includes audit, modernization plan, rolling delivery, knowledge transfer to your team. For deep-dive on TCO, see cost of nearshore software development 2026.

Single-domain modernization, 4-person team

Carve off 1 bounded context (e.g., billing), modernize, cut over. 1 senior architect, 2 senior backend, 1 DevOps. Right for testing the strangler approach before scaling. 6 to 9 months.

$30 to $42k / month
US equivalent: $90 to $140k / month

Mid-system modernization, 6-person team

3 to 5 bounded contexts modernized in parallel waves. 1 staff engineer, 3 senior backend, 1 senior frontend, 1 DevOps. Right for 200k to 800k LOC systems. 12 to 24 months.

$48 to $66k / month
US equivalent: $130 to $220k / month

Enterprise replatforming, 10-person team

Full system, multi-year. 1 staff, 4 senior backend, 2 senior frontend, 1 senior DevOps, 1 QA, 1 PM. Right for 1M+ LOC enterprise systems. 24 to 36 months, milestoned per bounded context.

$80 to $115k / month
US equivalent: $220 to $400k / month
06 [Process]

From audit to first cutover in 12 to 16 weeks

Day 0, free

Scoping call (60 minutes)

Current stack, system size (LOC, tables, traffic), business pain points, hiring constraints, regulatory load. We propose audit scope and budget within 5 working days.

Week 1 to 4

Audit and bounded context map

Senior architect plus 1 senior backend audit code, schema, infrastructure, deployment. Identify bounded contexts, prioritize by business risk and modernization value. Audit report includes carved-off candidate list with cost-benefit per context.

Week 5 to 6

Roadmap and team composition

Modernization roadmap with carved-off contexts, milestones, cutover criteria. Team composition (titles, seniorities, ramp plan). Stakeholder review and sign-off.

Week 7 to 8

Team assembly and infra setup

Team assembled, anti-corruption layer scaffolded, shadow infra (gateway, observability, parity test harness) deployed. First bounded context backlog refined.

Week 9 to 16

First bounded context shipped and cut over

First bounded context built, shadow tested for 1 to 2 weeks, cutover by feature flag in stages (1%, 10%, 50%, 100%). Old code path retained until 30-day silent monitoring done. Repeat for next context.

07 [Real client work]

Recent modernization engagements

See all case studies →
Strangler-pattern legacy modernization
In practice

One bounded context at a time, with rollback in one config flag

Anti-corruption layer between old and new code, shadow traffic for 1 to 2 weeks, parity proven before flag flip. Each carved-off service stays behind a feature flag for 30 days of silent monitoring before deprecation.

No big-bang. No 18-month projects that ship nothing until month 18. Business value every 8 to 12 weeks, milestoned per bounded context.

See full case study
08 [FAQ]

Legacy modernization FAQ

Modernize when the cost of NOT modernizing exceeds the cost of doing it: hiring becomes hard (no one wants to learn legacy stack), security patches lag, scaling hits a ceiling, integrations need workarounds. Leave it alone when the system works, change is rare, and total cost of ownership is low. The honest answer is rarely "rewrite everything".

Strangler pattern in 95% of cases. We carve off one bounded context at a time (auth, billing, reporting), reroute traffic to the new service, retire the old code, repeat. Big-bang rewrites have a 70%+ failure rate per industry data. The 5% where big-bang wins: tiny systems (under 10k lines), or business shutting down old product anyway.

Audit: 2 to 4 weeks. Strangler-style modernization: 12 to 36 months depending on system size, traffic volume, regulatory load. We milestone every 8 to 12 weeks against carved-off bounded contexts (auth, billing, customer-facing UI, internal admin). You see business value at every milestone, not just at month 36.

Source: PHP 5/7, .NET Framework, Java 8, Ruby on Rails 4/5, AngularJS 1.x, jQuery monoliths, classic ASP, ColdFusion. Target: TypeScript/Node, Go, Java 21+, .NET 8+, Python/FastAPI on modern infra (Kubernetes, AWS, Azure). We have engineers comfortable in legacy stacks who can do parallel-run testing during cutover.

With strangler pattern, no perceptible downtime. Each carved-off service goes live behind feature flag with shadow traffic for 1 to 2 weeks before cutover. We measure parity (response codes, latency, side effects) before flipping the flag. Rollback is one config change. We have done this for systems handling 50M+ daily requests.

Two-way sync during migration window (CDC via Debezium or vendor tools). Old and new systems both serve traffic until parity is proven. Final cutover is read-then-stop on old, validate, allow writes on new. We have migrated multi-TB databases with sub-1-minute switchover windows.

Mateusz Hauer
Mateusz Hauer
CEO, Hauer Power

Tell me the stack, system size and business pain. We propose audit scope and budget within 5 working days. Audit deliverable is yours regardless of whether you continue with us.

Book a call